Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you can Person Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The area out-of accessory when you look at the individual mating. Post on Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An effective. (2002). Internet contradiction reviewed. Log out-of Public Activities, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A social technical you to definitely decrease public engagement and psychological really-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.M., & Sphere, J. Yards. (2001). Amount, timing, and you may lifetime of marriage ceremonies and divorces. Most recent Populace Profile, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional analysis of intimacy, passions, and union: Evaluation the fresh new assumptions of your triangular idea away from love. Emotional Accounts, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., Japansk kvinder & Gerchak, E. (2004). Feeling best throughout the undertaking worse: Societal contrasting within this personal matchmaking. Diary from Identity and you may Public Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The brand new implicit cognition regarding intimate rivalry. Diary from Personality and Societal Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.

An excellent. (2001)mitment and you will relationships fix mechanisms

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention so you’re able to glamorous selection: The new changed mindset of matchmaking repairs. Advancement and Individual Choices, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential data out of disagreement and you will accord for the disappointed and you will nondistressed relationship lovers. Diary off Contacting and you will Health-related Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Green, A. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationship creation online: What is the huge interest? Record away from Social Circumstances, 58(1), 9–30.

The great benefits of confident illusions: Idealization while the framework of satisfaction into the close relationships

Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-investigations aim for the personal relationship: A model of worldwide improvement and particular confirmation. During the P. Noller & J. An excellent. Feeney (Eds.), Insights ents about examination of couples interaction (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College Push.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-specialist bond from lens of attachment concept. Psychotherapy: Idea, Browse, Practice, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh personal keeping track of program: Improved awareness to social signs since a transformative a reaction to societal exemption. For the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The newest personal outcast: Ostracism, personal difference, getting rejected, and you will intimidation (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Psychology Push.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). All over the world and particular relational activities on the experience of societal interactions. Journal away from Identity and you will Social Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A good., Tran, S., ). Accessory and information seeking for the close matchmaking. Identity and you will Personal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you will certain accessory representations into the adulthood: Could there be a love?. Log From Societal And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. When you look at the J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic romantic relationships: Restoration and improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A great. D. (2000). Projection yourself effect certainly one of partners once the a purpose of the resemblance within mutual event. Identity And you can Social Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Negative effects of salience of extrinsic advantages to your liking and you may loving. Record away from Identification and you can Public Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.